Is The Church Of Scientology Behind The Attacks On Paul Haggis?

Is The Church Of Scientology Behind The Attacks On Paul Haggis?

Leah Remini And Mike Rinder Suspect The Church Of Scientology Is Behind The Attacks On Paul Haggis

Four women have stepped forward and are accusing Paul Haggis of sexual assault. Including accusations of rape. Haggis said one woman, Haleigh Breest, was trying to extort him for $9 million after threatening to come out and accuse him of rape.  He denied her claims and said it would’ve been physically impossible for him to rape her, because he was recovering from back surgery when the alleged assault took place.

More accusers came forward.

The lawsuit spurred three more women to claim sexual assault and harassment by Haggis.

According to the Associated Press, one of the accusers claimed Haggis made her perform non-consensual oral sex and then raped her.

Another accuser said Haggis told her “I need to be inside you.” She said she was able to escape.

In separate interviews with the AP, the three new accusers provided detailed accounts of encounters they say occurred between 1996 and 2015. The women were early in their careers in the entertainment business when, they say, the Hollywood heavyweight lured them to private or semi-private places under the guise of discussing productions or a subject of a professional nature.

They all said Haggis first tried to kiss them. In two of the cases, they said, when they fought back, Haggis escalated his aggression.




Leah Remini and Mike Rinder respond

“There is plenty of reason to worry about defending anyone accused of sexual assault in today’s climate. But the fear of consequences for speaking our truth has not held us back in the past and isn’t about to start now,” Rinder and Remini wrote in a blog post. “Paul Haggis is a good man who has been a friend to us and so many others. He has championed the rights of women, the LGBT community and has fought for and devoted himself to the underprivileged in the world,” they continued. “These are not ‘PR stunts’ — he has devoted his time, skill and money to worthy causes without fanfare for decades.”

Like those of us who were scientologists, we trusted and confided in our church to seek resolution for our shortcomings. What is different about scientology is the detailed records they maintain of everything you tell them. And beyond that, they conduct intense interrogations based on the idea that only when all specifics and details are disclosed can one find relief. The names, dates, and minute details of any indiscretions, and even thoughts, are all recorded.

It is not a crime to be attracted to women (or men). It’s not a crime to flirt. Or to have sexual relations with someone. It might not be acceptable to your significant other (if you have one), but it certainly isn’t criminal nor worthy of newspaper headlines.

Only a scientologist can understand the pressure one feels to offer up even the slightest thing that the scientology organization might consider a transgression of THEIR mores. This information is used against anyone who departs scientology and dares speak their mind. This is not imaginary. There is a documented history of such things. When someone is a declared an “enemy” by scientology, they are fair game.

With the name of everyone one might have thought of, flirted with or taken on a date, it takes little imagination to conjure a string of accusers being contacted and suddenly appearing out of the woodwork.

We expect the next “revelations” about Paul Haggis in this campaign to destroy him to be based on information culled from his Scientology files in the form of more “anonymous” accusers, hiding behind a lawyer who will never have to disclose who is paying their bill.

Those who accuse without going to law enforcement, those who seek hush money to keep their stories secret, those who make accusations to the media anonymously – they are suspect. And when the target of these tactics is someone who is a prominent critic of scientology, it is very suspect.

Paul Haggis deserves, based on his record as a gentleman and humanitarian, to be judged when all the evidence has been taken under penalty of perjury in a court of law. Because claims of anonymous accusers who have NOT gone to law enforcement are not credible.

Leah Remini

Mike Rinder

This is interesting… We’ll be waiting for more to come out on this and when it does we will update.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.