According to this, the editor in chief of the Wall Street Journal, Gerard Baker, told reporters in no uncertain terms that the newspaper was committed to fair and objective journalism, no matter who was president. And if the reporters have a problem with that, they could find employment elsewhere –
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Gerard Baker told his reporters Monday the paper would not abandon objectivity in its coverage of President Donald Trump, and directed them to find work somewhere else if they want to adopt a more oppositional tone.
“It’s a little irritating when I read that we have been soft on Donald Trump,” he told his reporters and editors, a source at the newsroom meeting told The New York Times. Baker held the meeting ostensibly to have a casual conversation on the editorial direction of the paper, but it was held on the heels of reports the newsroom is in turmoil over the Trump coverage.
This comes after reports of WSJ staffers being unhappy with the supposed “soft treatment” the newspaper has given to Donald Trump and his administration. Which begs the question – do these reporters want to be associated with the Screeching of the Damned coming from other news outlets these days? I wouldn’t characterize anything that, say, the New York Times or CNN or the Washington Post have been doing as “journalism.” More like weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth –
The Trump coverage is “neutral to the point of being absurd,” one source inside the newsroom recently told Politico. Criticism peaked when Baker sent a memo to staff instructing reporters and editors to tone down the use of “loaded” language in coverage of Trump’s immigration ban. (RELATED: WSJ Reporters Complain The Paper Won’t Join In Trump Circus)
Baker strongly defended his paper’s coverage as objective in the meeting, going so far as to read from a list of past WSJ headlines compiled to refute the criticism. He suggested it is other outlets such as The New York Times that have abandoned fair reporting standards and objectivity — not The Wall Street Journal — and that those standards aren’t going anywhere.